<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Null-Logic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://null-logic.net/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://null-logic.net/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:33:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Supercuts Sucks Supercocks by lance</title>
		<link>http://null-logic.net/blog/2007/12/10/supercuts-sucks-supercocks/comment-page-1/#comment-21252</link>
		<dc:creator>lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://null-logic.net/blog/2007/12/10/supercuts-sucks-supercocks/#comment-21252</guid>
		<description>I have read many complaints about Supercuts, well, I have seen people respond to them by &quot;I am a stylist there and its super awesome OMG&quot;
When I worked at supercuts for six plus years, I saw so many talented and not so talented stylists go through the revolving door of employment, that one could easily fill a stadium with angry stylists.
I could write a book about my complaints about supercuts but I will stick to the most pressing.
Supercuts when they hire you make you go though a training proccess called HSA, I ve seen alot of people say they saw people not get passed, but quite frankly I saw my regional supervisor pass girls because they were pretty. HSA is a enviromental disastor for a company that claims to care. Each stylist goes through at least three manequin hair heads, and those get thrown in the trash when done. Also they make each of there stylists go through recertification yearly, again the same three heads for how many stylists?
Supercuts doesnt want you to have a bond with the stylists. thats why you see so many good hairdressers get fired for crazy reasons. They dont want you to follow the stylist when they leave.
But that doesnt ever stop the managers from handing out their cards on the sly.
They hire girls that are not even done hairdressing school based on their atractiveness, I heard area supervisor June armstrong say that one girl was so pretty that the dumb men would run to get their hair cut by her.
Anyone unlucky enough to get their hair cut by her, were not amazed by her beauty, I saw people storm out.
If this girl worked friday night, sure enough saturday morning would have a room full of re-do&#039;s.
I would say take a job there if you like working in a enviroment that wants you to be brainless zombies. and heaven forbid if you ever talk about anything besides their product. They have something called &quot;superpick&quot; which must be whatever dusty old product they have funking around the regis warehouse, it is your job to try to sell superpick to everyone, example one weeks it was a silicone based thick gel. tell me what a old lady who gets her hair washed and set is going to do with a thick gel? I actualy got written up for selling that lady hairspray instead!
and the write ups are another fun thing! they like to write up every thing they do so they can use it against you when they decide to axe you. They tried in my area to &quot;review&quot; a girl weekly till they bullied her into quiting.

If you like being bullied and overworked then supercuts is for you!
I wake up everyday and am I happy I dont have to work there anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read many complaints about Supercuts, well, I have seen people respond to them by &#8220;I am a stylist there and its super awesome OMG&#8221;<br />
When I worked at supercuts for six plus years, I saw so many talented and not so talented stylists go through the revolving door of employment, that one could easily fill a stadium with angry stylists.<br />
I could write a book about my complaints about supercuts but I will stick to the most pressing.<br />
Supercuts when they hire you make you go though a training proccess called HSA, I ve seen alot of people say they saw people not get passed, but quite frankly I saw my regional supervisor pass girls because they were pretty. HSA is a enviromental disastor for a company that claims to care. Each stylist goes through at least three manequin hair heads, and those get thrown in the trash when done. Also they make each of there stylists go through recertification yearly, again the same three heads for how many stylists?<br />
Supercuts doesnt want you to have a bond with the stylists. thats why you see so many good hairdressers get fired for crazy reasons. They dont want you to follow the stylist when they leave.<br />
But that doesnt ever stop the managers from handing out their cards on the sly.<br />
They hire girls that are not even done hairdressing school based on their atractiveness, I heard area supervisor June armstrong say that one girl was so pretty that the dumb men would run to get their hair cut by her.<br />
Anyone unlucky enough to get their hair cut by her, were not amazed by her beauty, I saw people storm out.<br />
If this girl worked friday night, sure enough saturday morning would have a room full of re-do&#8217;s.<br />
I would say take a job there if you like working in a enviroment that wants you to be brainless zombies. and heaven forbid if you ever talk about anything besides their product. They have something called &#8220;superpick&#8221; which must be whatever dusty old product they have funking around the regis warehouse, it is your job to try to sell superpick to everyone, example one weeks it was a silicone based thick gel. tell me what a old lady who gets her hair washed and set is going to do with a thick gel? I actualy got written up for selling that lady hairspray instead!<br />
and the write ups are another fun thing! they like to write up every thing they do so they can use it against you when they decide to axe you. They tried in my area to &#8220;review&#8221; a girl weekly till they bullied her into quiting.</p>
<p>If you like being bullied and overworked then supercuts is for you!<br />
I wake up everyday and am I happy I dont have to work there anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Cat Likes Digg and is Stupid by George</title>
		<link>http://null-logic.net/blog/2008/03/08/my-cat-likes-digg-and-is-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-20534</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 21:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://null-logic.net/blog/2008/03/08/my-cat-likes-digg-and-is-stupid/#comment-20534</guid>
		<description>Oliver is most definitely not stupid.  There are those who called him &quot;Smartie&quot; back in the day....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oliver is most definitely not stupid.  There are those who called him &#8220;Smartie&#8221; back in the day&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on www is for queers. by dprevite</title>
		<link>http://null-logic.net/blog/2007/11/26/www-is-for-queers/comment-page-1/#comment-19620</link>
		<dc:creator>dprevite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 16:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://null-logic.net/blog/2007/11/26/www-is-for-queers/#comment-19620</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s for the bad kind of queer. You and I can stick with www-less websites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s for the bad kind of queer. You and I can stick with www-less websites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on www is for queers. by Chris</title>
		<link>http://null-logic.net/blog/2007/11/26/www-is-for-queers/comment-page-1/#comment-19607</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://null-logic.net/blog/2007/11/26/www-is-for-queers/#comment-19607</guid>
		<description>It is?  I&#039;m adding www to ALL my websites now.  Just so folks know I&#039;m out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is?  I&#8217;m adding www to ALL my websites now.  Just so folks know I&#8217;m out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using Subversion for Web Development by Nate</title>
		<link>http://null-logic.net/blog/2008/02/14/using-subversion-for-web-development/comment-page-1/#comment-18334</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://null-logic.net/blog/2008/02/14/using-subversion-for-web-development/#comment-18334</guid>
		<description>We are starting to use a similar method for versioning on our video library.  The best method we came up with was similar to yours.  We are using asp.net for the website however, just on the same physical machine and it seems as if everything will work out well.  We have one beta server where changes to the truck will be auto updated to consolidate modifications.

SQL Server is similar in that each person has their own sql server database.  From their database scripts will be generated nightly into a directory structure that generates one script per object, and uses different subfolders for tables, views, procs, and functions.  The Database Repository then checks for changes and merges them nightly to the beta database server.

Only tricky part I see is handling the global.asax and Web.config files because database locations are stored there.  Thus they always need changes manually merged to not overwrite the association between website and database.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are starting to use a similar method for versioning on our video library.  The best method we came up with was similar to yours.  We are using asp.net for the website however, just on the same physical machine and it seems as if everything will work out well.  We have one beta server where changes to the truck will be auto updated to consolidate modifications.</p>
<p>SQL Server is similar in that each person has their own sql server database.  From their database scripts will be generated nightly into a directory structure that generates one script per object, and uses different subfolders for tables, views, procs, and functions.  The Database Repository then checks for changes and merges them nightly to the beta database server.</p>
<p>Only tricky part I see is handling the global.asax and Web.config files because database locations are stored there.  Thus they always need changes manually merged to not overwrite the association between website and database.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sample CodeIgniter Blog Controller by dprevite</title>
		<link>http://null-logic.net/blog/2008/02/13/blog-controller/comment-page-1/#comment-14574</link>
		<dc:creator>dprevite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 15:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://null-logic.net/blog/2008/02/13/blog-controller/#comment-14574</guid>
		<description>Yeah, _load_links() and _load_content() should definitely be in the model. I was just trying to keep it short in the blog post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, _load_links() and _load_content() should definitely be in the model. I was just trying to keep it short in the blog post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sample CodeIgniter Blog Controller by Mahbub</title>
		<link>http://null-logic.net/blog/2008/02/13/blog-controller/comment-page-1/#comment-14361</link>
		<dc:creator>Mahbub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 11:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://null-logic.net/blog/2008/02/13/blog-controller/#comment-14361</guid>
		<description>Although this is an old post, but why do you have DB related routines in Blog Controller ? Aren&#039;t they supposed to be in a Model for re-use? If you need to get the links in another controller by this function 

    function _load_links() {
      $query = $this-&gt;db-&gt;get(&#039;links&#039;);
      return $query-&gt;result();
    }

You&#039;ll probably have to write it again because you can&#039;t call this _load_links mehtod in another controller (And of course you can&#039;t call a controller method in another controller). So no MVC is followed here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although this is an old post, but why do you have DB related routines in Blog Controller ? Aren&#8217;t they supposed to be in a Model for re-use? If you need to get the links in another controller by this function </p>
<p>    function _load_links() {<br />
      $query = $this-&gt;db-&gt;get(&#8216;links&#8217;);<br />
      return $query-&gt;result();<br />
    }</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll probably have to write it again because you can&#8217;t call this _load_links mehtod in another controller (And of course you can&#8217;t call a controller method in another controller). So no MVC is followed here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Supercuts Sucks Supercocks by supercuts sucks!</title>
		<link>http://null-logic.net/blog/2007/12/10/supercuts-sucks-supercocks/comment-page-1/#comment-14323</link>
		<dc:creator>supercuts sucks!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 18:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://null-logic.net/blog/2007/12/10/supercuts-sucks-supercocks/#comment-14323</guid>
		<description>damn dude, at least yours isn&#039;t as noticeable as what they did to me!
it&#039;s almost as if they shaved my entire head and glued decomposed rat fur to my head!
everybody says I look awful and that i shoulnd not have cut it, but oh well, it&#039;s too late for that now...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>damn dude, at least yours isn&#8217;t as noticeable as what they did to me!<br />
it&#8217;s almost as if they shaved my entire head and glued decomposed rat fur to my head!<br />
everybody says I look awful and that i shoulnd not have cut it, but oh well, it&#8217;s too late for that now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Multiple Views with CodeIgniter 1.6 by Naushad</title>
		<link>http://null-logic.net/blog/2008/02/07/multiple-views-with-codeigniter-16/comment-page-1/#comment-12128</link>
		<dc:creator>Naushad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://null-logic.net/blog/2008/02/07/multiple-views-with-codeigniter-16/#comment-12128</guid>
		<description>how can i use database values in html tables ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how can i use database values in html tables ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Multiple Views with CodeIgniter 1.6 by kuve</title>
		<link>http://null-logic.net/blog/2008/02/07/multiple-views-with-codeigniter-16/comment-page-1/#comment-1522</link>
		<dc:creator>kuve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://null-logic.net/blog/2008/02/07/multiple-views-with-codeigniter-16/#comment-1522</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve tried it and it works, now I can use blocks in my websites.

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve tried it and it works, now I can use blocks in my websites.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
